Premium Collection: The Money You Billed and Never Actually Collected
An insurer writes the policy, bills the premium, and books the revenue. Somewhere between that and the bank account, a proportion quietly fails to arrive. A direct debit bounces, a card expires, an instalment is missed, a broker's account doesn't reconcile. Individually these are small operational events handled by a collections process. In aggregate they're a persistent leak, and at a lot of insurers nobody can say precisely how big it is — because the data needed to answer that question is spread across billing, banking, and policy administration and never gets joined.
Why collection failure hides
Billing systems know what was invoiced. Bank feeds know what was received. Policy systems know whether cover lapsed. The interesting question — which customers are failing to pay, why, and what happened to their policy as a result — sits across all three, and the join is often incomplete. So collection is managed as a queue of individual failures to chase rather than as a measurable business problem with patterns, causes, and a cost you could quantify and reduce.
Where it breaks down
- Billed and received aren't reconciled at customer level. Totals may balance while individual failures go unexamined.
- Failure reasons aren't captured as data. Expired card, insufficient funds, disputed amount — all get handled, none get analysed.
- Lapse isn't connected to payment. A policy cancels for non-payment without the customer's payment history informing whether that was avoidable.
- Broker accounts settle in bulk. Aggregated settlements make it hard to see which underlying policies were actually paid.
Why it's a data-foundation problem
Collections improves when you can see it, and seeing it means joining billing, banking and policy data at customer level with failure reasons captured as structured data. Do that and patterns emerge: which payment methods fail most, which segments recover after a retry, which lapses were a payment problem rather than a decision to leave. That turns chasing into targeting, and turns avoidable lapse into retained customers. It's the same join-and-measure foundation behind premium leakage and quote conversion, pointed at the cash you already earned.
What good looks like
- Billed, received and lapsed joined at customer and policy level, not just in totals.
- Structured failure reasons so collection problems can be analysed rather than only worked.
- Payment history informing retention so an avoidable lapse is recognised as avoidable.
- Broker settlements reconciled down to the policies they cover.
Premium you billed and didn't collect is the cheapest revenue in the business to recover, because you already won the customer and priced the risk. Building the data foundation that makes the leak visible is exactly the kind of work we do with insurers at IntelliBooks.
Written premium is a promise. Collected premium is the business. It's worth being able to measure the gap.
Comments
Post a Comment